September 11, 2011 journal, Cheney gang and his phony false flag attack upon America. The following information came from a Microsoft pop-up showing Michael Moore and George W. Bush where it turns out Michael Moore was right all the time he was being rebuked by the crooked Bush administration as just being a dirty old Liberal Democrat. America was attack on nine double one by the Israeli Mossad and not the Arab terrorist. They cleverly blamed it on 19 hijackers who really had nothing to do with it or any other Arab person believe it or not the message is gradually getting out until one-third of people in America now believe the government was involved or knew about the pending attack. It is not correct to say George Bush was settling a score with Saddam because he is a moron incapable of plotting war on his own, he was just obeying orders like all presidents. There is a groundswell of evidence proving if you will nine double one to be a false flag venture to create an excuse for war in the Middle East against all Israeli Arab neighbors, and yes the war also offered great riches for the Zionist Wall Streeters and owners of the private foreign Federal Reserve Bank the product of the 1913 Federal Reserve Act of swindling of the American people. The wholly owned Zionist press has kept the lid on this great secret for 10 years but it is becoming crystal clear that this was a bait & switch operation to blame the Arabs for what the neo-cons did to engage us in massive wars to destroy the neighbors of Israel and steal Iraq's oil and opening the floodgates for private contractors to get super rich with slush money transported by wide-body aircraft. What a scam but eventually they're going to find one of those aircraft buried at sea at which time all hell will break open and these Republican extremists conservatives that participated in nine double one like Bush and Cheney gang will be hunted down like Khaddafi in Libya. 8 of the accused hijackers are still alive in their native countries victims of ID theft. You cannot contain the secret forever but if anybody gets religion and decides to confess it, they would be thrown into a mental institution or eliminated immediately which is my opinion from what I see the radicals in America are capable of doing to a whistle blower. Money talks and money walks and the Illuminati rides with Israel. They are all one and the same. 80% of the residents of Israel are Russians, they are not the ancient Israelites. The Zionist are imitation Jewish and they rule the world on the strength of the U.S. dollar which they own and control out right. The pigs keep returning to the mudholes including the Church especially the televangelists supporting bloody Israeli wars & threatening Iran. The 700 Club use of be genuine programming with old hymms & spiritual songs but now it is strictly political with Pat Roberson's own personal agenda to destroy Iran for Israel. The following article is the nearest thing I have seen published to the truth yet on 9*1*1. http://www.slate.com/id/2302834?GT1=38001 "In the immediate aftermath of 9*1*1, conspiracists started to create and spread what would ultimately become the foundational mythology of the 9/1x1 conspiracy movement: In order to suppress civil liberties and benefit their allies in the oil and gas industry, hawk-ish neoconservatives in the Bush administration-along with their partners in the C*I*A and F*B*I, of course-orchestrated a massive terror attack that killed 2,977 innocent civilians and mobilized the American populace behind otherwise unsupportable wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. There is no consistent polling about the popularity of this theory. But in the early years of the decade, at least, it was relegated to the far reaches of the American political spectrum, a place memorably described in Richard Hofstadter's Paranoid Style in American Politics. In May 2002, with Bush's approval rating still well over 70 percent, fewer than one in 10 Americans in a CBS News poll said that the Bush administration was lying about what it knew regarding possible terrorist attacks prior to 9*1*1. By April 2004, 16 percent of respondents in a CBS News poll said that the Bush administration was "mostly lying" about what it knew about possible terrorist attacks against the United States prior to 9*1*1, while 56 percent said it was telling the truth but hiding something and 24 percent said it was telling the entire truth. By the five-year anniversary of the attacks, one in 3 Americans would tell pollsters that it was likely that the government either had a hand in the attacks of 9*1*1 or allowed them to happen in order to go to war in the Middle East. What caused these ideas, by the middle of the decade, to enter the political mainstream? It's hard to say whether widespread discontent and mistrust makes people more willing to listen to ideas they previously considered as absurd. But it seems plausible. And there can be little doubt that by the middle of 2006, 9*1*1 conspiracy theorists had a new base to draw from. That base was the general unhappiness with the war in Iraq and a small but deep strain of Bush hatred. The 9/1/1 conspiracy theories got a hearing in Europe and among liberal intellectuals like Gore Vidal before they rose in popularity in America. French author Thierry Meyssan's 9/1/1: The Big Lie, which postulated that the Pentagon was not struck by a jetliner but by a smaller military aircraft or a missile, was the No. 1 best-selling book in France for six weeks in the spring of 2002. By October, Vidal was seriously exploring a wide range of conspiracy theories that the Bush administration had been complicit in 9 double one for geostrategic reasons in an essay in Britain's Observer. At home, such talk remained on the fringes of political life even as the war got under way. But fueled in part by anger over the deceptions of the war, the lack of accountability or disclosure on the part of the Bush administration with respect to the 9*1*1 Commission, and civil liberties abuses in the aftermath of the attacks, the popularity of conspiracy theories was steadily growing in 2003 and 2004. Then, in the summer of 2004, Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9*1*1 was released, earning more than $100 million to become the top-grossing documentary of all time. While Fahrenheit 9/1/1 does not allege any sort of Bush-led conspiracy concerning 9*1*1, the film does depict a government hell-bent on covering up how much it knew prior to 9*1*1 and using the attacks as a false pretext for a war with Iraq. In 2004, more and more Americans were willing to raise these kinds of questions. Bush derangement syndrome, as Charles Krauthammer would famously call the emerging trend of Bush hat-red, had not yet reached a boiling point. But it would. Within 3 years of his film's release, Moore himself would start giving credence to some of the more out-there conspiracy theories. When I asked several leading 9*1*1 conspiracists who or what inspired them to join, they did not name self-proclaimed founding father Alex Jones. As popular as Jones is, and as much influence as he has had in spreading the 91/1 conspiracy theory, the 37-year-old Texan new-media provocateur is not the movement's intellectual leader. That title belongs to the grandfatherly 72-year-old academic David Ray Griffin. On 9/1/1, Griffin was a well-respected professor of philosophy at the Claremont School of Theology in Southern California. Believing that the attacks had been prompted by overly interventionist American foreign policy, Griffin shortly thereafter began working on a book about American imperialism. He was two-thirds of the way through with the project when, in March 2003, a colleague sent him a link to Paul Thompson's terror timeline, a go-to source among 9-1 researchers of all stripes. The timeline includes more than 5,000 reports that catalog every mainstream media account that could be cited as demonstrating inconsistencies in the official story or the possibility of government fore-knowledge. It describes dozens of warnings about an upcoming terror attack prior to 9-1-1, all reported in mainstream media, and points to allegations that members of the Pakistani-ISI had aided the 9*1*1 attackers, strongly implying that the CIA also knew. At the time that Griffin picked up the timeline, it also pointed to inconsistencies in NORAD's story and wondered aloud why the planes had not been intercepted. All of this was simmering in Griffin's mind in March 2003. "We realized how important 9-1-1 was when we saw it wasn't just attacking Afghanistan, but then using that to go into Iraq," Griffin told me. When one of his students asked him to put together a presentation about 9x1 as the pretext for the war in Iraq, Griffin obliged. Soon after he began working on a magazine article based on the presentation, which would eventually become too sprawling for a periodical. It became The New Pearl Harbor, published in 2004, the first of more than 10 books Griffin has written about 9*1*1. Although it relies upon factual inaccuracies, leaps of logic, and selective quotations to create a complex web of conspiracy leading to the top of the Bush administration, Griffin's work is still held up by 9/1*1 conspiracy theorists as a masterpiece of the genre. Former University of Wisconsin lecturer Kevin Barrett, who is the leading advocate of theories that Israel's Mossad orchestrated the 9one1 attacks, is one of the conspiracists who cites Griffin as his inspiration for joining the movement. Barrett came to renown in 9/1*1 conspiracy circles in 2006 after being castigated on Fox News by Sean Hannity and Bill O'Reilly during a national debate about the 9/1/1 conspiracy theory and academic freedom on the Madison campus. Though he had his doubts about the mainstream account, Barrett had dismissed 9*1*1 conspiracy theories as ridiculous speculations prior to 2003. But after hearing that Griffin was "marshalling the evidence" for the case that the Word Trade Center had been brought down by a controlled demolition and the Pentagon had been attacked by a military aircraft, Barrett decided to do more research. After two weeks of reading the work of Ruppert, Meyssan, and others, he was convinced. "I kind of went from saying, 'Well, this is really interesting that somebody as sensible and careful and empirical as David Ray Griffin would give credence to these pretty bizarre speculations,' to 2 weeks later, 'My God, this is absolutely right.' " Over the next several months he held teach-ins on the Madison campus. But he never took his activism beyond that until just days after President Bush's re-election. It was the second battle of Fallujah, which took place during the Muslim holy month of Ramadan, that caused Barrett, who had converted to Islam years before, to become a full-time activist. "The images and the stories coming out of Fallujah were so atrocious," he said. "That actually was the moment when I said, 'Well, I need to take this to the next level. What can be done to stop this growing war?' " After Fallujah, Barrett decided to start a group called the Muslim-Jewish-Christian Alliance for 9/1/1 Truth. After losing his teaching job, in 2007, he turned his attention to conspiracism full time, as he continues that work to this day. In mid-2002, an 18-year-old from upstate New. York named Dylan Avery discovered Paul Thompson's timeline of terror. Like David Ray Griffin, Avery was impressed, and he soon became convinced that the govern-ment was not revealing the whole story of 9/1*1. Avery started working on the screenplay for a feature film about a group of three friends who discovered a government cover-up. The Bush administration's lack of complete cooperation with the 91/1 Commission, along with the powerlessness of anti-war protesters to slow the march to war in Iraq, drew him to the community of 9*1*1 conspiracists in 2003 & 2004. "It was just so easy to believe anything terrible about your government because you were seeing all of these terrible things," Avery told me. "They were doing all of these terrible things right in front of our faces, so why wouldn't they do terrible things behind closed doors?" After realizing that a full-budget action feature was too ambitious for an 18-year-old director, Avery decided to turn his film into a documentary. Working with his childhood friend Korey Rowe, who had just returned from a tour of duty in Iraq, Avery cut together an 82-minute documentary that compiled many of the more out-there conspiracy theories about 9/11, including the charge that the South Tower was not struck by a United Airlines commercial flight but rather a military drone. The film, produced for $2,000, was released in April 2005. At the time, Avery was working as a waiter at Red Lobster. It didn't do spectacularly well. Avery struggled to get Alex Jones to cover it on his website, and the movie was attacked by others in the movement for its factual problems. In response to the criticism, Avery cut a new edition and released it at the end of 2005, which turned out to be "the perfect time." Discontent with the Iraq war, and the Bush administration generally, spiked in 2006 as sectarian violence tipped into civil war. A majority of Americans consistently said that the Bush administration had deliberately misled the public about whether Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, while 58 percent said the government was misleading the public about how the war was going. Bush's approval rating sunk to new lows. "The distrust built up over time," Avery said. "It led, I think, to the culmination of the movement in 2005, 2006, which is when a lot of people had these doubts that were building up over years, but didn't really have an outlet for it." In July 2006, a Scripps-Howard poll found that 36 percent of Americans said it was "somewhat likely" or "very likely" that federal officials assisted in the 9*1*1 attacks or took no action to stop them because they wanted the United States to go to war in the Middle East. A Zogby poll one year later found 31 percent saying that elements of the government either orchestrated the attacks or let them happen for geopolitical reasons. The re-cut version of Avery's film became the most influential piece of 9/1/1 conspiracy agitprop, attracting tens of millions of views or downloads on YouTube and other sites. Mainstream media outlets started hounding Avery and Rowe for interviews. In the summer of 2006, Avery says, "Vanity Fair came to our house. CNN came to our house. MSNBC. CNN. Calls would not stop." But Avery's faith in the theory, like the intensity of Bush hatred in the population generally, has faded with time. "Nobody really seems to care anymore," he says. "I don't know what it was, but I guess that climate of fear during the Bush administration, while it certainly was oppressive and made us feel like that Big Brother was literally lurking around the corner, it got people off their ass. It made people active, it made people want to join the anti-war movement." Since 2006 Avery has re-cut the film twice more, removing some of the more outrageous accusations, like the claim that Flight 93 had been diverted to Cleveland Hopkins Airport rather than crashing in Pennsylvania and that calls made from the plane had been faked using "voice-morphing" technology. After interviewing some of the Pentagon witnesses in person, Avery has even backed away from the stance that it was a missile and not a plane that hit the Pentagon. "It's easy to come to conclusions when a) you don't have a lot of information at your disposal and b) you haven't had a chance to actually talk to people who were there," Avery says. What does Avery think of 9/11 conspiracy theories now? He thinks that while orchestrating the attacks was beyond the scope of the Bush administration, there was "considerable foreknowledge" within the government so that it should have been able to prevent them. Why it did not is his new focus. "Where I am now is, I've whittled it down to a very basic statement that I think a lot of people can agree on: There was a cover-up of some kind," Avery says. "The only question is what they were covering up, how far [up] it goes, how deep it runs, and how many asses would be on the line if the truth actually came out." He says he still "support[s] the movement," but he also acknowledges getting "sucked in" deeper than he should have been, into a "hardcore mentality that it was almost too easy to get into back then, because the war had just started and everybody was just so pissed off." "It was easy to distrust everything," he says, "because there was nothing you could trust." Tomorrow: How the 9/1*1 movement responded to its critics. Click here to launch a slide show on the top five techniques of 9/1*1 conspiracy theory documentaries. 389 Comments-Add Yours Or join the discussion on the Fray SLATE PHOTO GALLERIES Flags for 9/1x1-The Unpretentious Houses of Alvar Aalto Still Separated at Birth? Do Spy magazine's celebrity lookalikes still look alike? Jeremy Stahl is Slate's social media editor. Illustration by Alex Eben Meyer. Photographs: Twin Towers by Seth McAllister/AFP/Getty Images. George W. Bush by Bill Pugliano/Getty Images. Megaphone by Stockbyte/Thinkstock. Osama Bin Laden by AFP/Getty Images. George W. Bush by Paul J. Richards/AFP/Getty Images. Larry Bishop . I think I am going to read the book "The New Pearl Harbor" by David Ray Griffin Patrick Buglass I think this is the most grand human betrayal ever and I had my suspicions on that first day-watching the footage of Bush reading to third-graders and that stupid look on his face when the SS informed him of the unfolding of events-a moment which he could not accurately recreate in his own head during a speech. As someone else put it on youtube, the Secret Service would have grabbed him and wisked him away in a frenzy in case there were planned attacks on the president at his present location. Such a farce-and that look on his face. Reagan was the actor, remember? I sensed it right then and there and I am not boasting. Bush and so many others-such a disappointment to this country. The blind patriotism scares me. How do all involved live with themselves? Please also look up 'thermite' and its' use in building demolitions on youtube. Jason Shingleton I personally can't understand how evidence of this magnitude, reality and just jaw dropping can be over looked. Only way I can begin to say that some people choose to overlook the facts staring them dead in the face is this: If you believe that two airplanes dropped two of the tallest buildings in the world is simply ignorant stating the facts, then even more importantly caused another building not even struck by a plane to drop at freefall speed is even more unintelligent. Knowing how much concrete and steel were placed in those buildings. Then on top of that all the witness reports of explosions, from firefighters, police officers and civilians is basically calling all those that were there non-credible. I would think in my opinion that those certain few people would be more credible under any circumstance than the ignorant assholes that wrote the findings by the 9/11 commission. I suggest that people become a little more involved in the information they allow to become reality in their heads, because if you think that those buildings were not disposed of for political gain or protection you are an idiot. It was really convenient to lose all the documents that were held in the number 7 building mounds of financial information indictments and evidence of past wrong doings of our government cleaned up by a selected few whom we all know cares nothing about the freedoms, civil liberties of the people that live here. The reason you don't believe or choose to see the facts is only because you are not ready for the alternative. Your government will dispose of you under the proper circumstances, not to mention it would be a hard pill to swallow. Honestly not seeing the truth before its to late is going to be lots harder to swallow because next time it might be the people who are closest to you that suffer because of another plot to start the expansion of the next piece of land airfield or oil reserve, maybe a few poppy fields. Who knows The Rich Get Richer!!! At east I don't swallow the garbage that comes afterwords.. L Streeter Edwards THE TRUTH ABOUT 9x1x1 (Part One) The illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq had nothing to do with Al-Qaeda or a terrorist threat to America. The invasion was designed by the neoconservatives (AKA neo-cons), whose geneses was a group of New York Zionists that got together during the Depression and World War II, and went on to become the architects of the multi-decade debacle known as Israel. They planned the invasion of Iraq long before Bush ever thought about running for president, long before he stole the 2000 election, and long before the 9/1*1 attacks. Maybe the neo-cons and the Bush Administration did not have anything to do with the 9/1*1 attacks directly, but do not be guileless enough to believe that they were not complicit at some level. At the very least they knew about the scheme, let it happen, and not long afterwards America invaded Afghanistan ... which seemed appropriate at the time. They were out for the blood of Osama bin Laden. . or were they? When the 9-11 attacks occurred many members of Osama's family were in the States, doing business with Cheney, hobnobbing with the Bush family, and negotiating defense contracts with Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz. Perfect. They could be helpful in tracking down Osama, better roundup that family for questioning. The Bush Administration rounded up Osama's family, but not for question-ing. They flew them back to Saudi Arabia. All of America's airports were closed; no planes flew for ten days; America's airspace was empty ... except for the planes that evacuated the family of the most wanted man in the world, the alleged architect of the 9/1*1 attacks. That happened because the aftermath of 9/1x1 was not about getting Osama, not about invading Afghanistan, and not about protecting America from terrorism. The aftermath of 9*1*1 was the pretext for invading Iraq. The invasion had already been planned, and the excuse fell into their laps ... out of the sky, so to speak. Cheney and his cohorts wanted to do it for oil and money, the Zionists wanted to do it to create a "new world order" and support Israel, and Bush wanted to do it because Saddam Hussein had "threatened to kill my daddy!" CONTINUE ON TO PART TWO OR, to read it all and more truth and common-sense from L Streeter ... Google "expatmusing.blogspot" Mark Hunter -The Official Version is a Conspiracy Theory. L Streeter Edwards THE TRUTH ABOUT 9;1;1 (Part 2) "Now seriously, even if the brainwashed Stepford Republicans didn't believe the implications, and continued to support Bush, Madam Rice, and the Gang of Four (Cheney, Rove, Rumsfeld, and Wolfowitz), how do they explain that for the entirety of Bush's eight years in office, Osama was neither caught nor killed ... he was never even located. The richest and mightiest nation in the world was out to get the guy, over 100,000 troops were deployed, and 8 years later still no result. If the Bush Administration wanted to get him, they would have. But there was absolutely no benefit in capturing Osama because, if they had, Bush, Madam Rice, and the Gang of Four would have had no excuse for invading and occupying Iraq. Iraq was not harboring Osama. Iraq was not a threat to the U.S.A. Iraq had no WMDs, despite the Bush Administration's lies and fabrications. Al-Qaeda was not in Iraq, at least not until Bush's team created the chaos there. The entire disastrous situation in Iraq was about oil and money, the neo-cons' obsession with creating a "New World Order", and Bush wanting to get Saddam Hussein because he had "threatened to kill my daddy!" Bill Clinton lied about a blow job in The White House, and all of the hypocritical right-wing moralists were outraged ... but Bush, Madam Rice, and the Gang of Four lied to the world about the threat of Iraq, and the Stepford Republican Patriots just followed right along-like Lemmings heading for a cliff-while the Bush Administration illegally invaded and illegally occupied a sovereign nation, killed thousands of American youngsters, and murdered tens and tens of thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children. All for oil and money! To read more truth and common-sense from L Streeter ... Google "expatmusing.blogspot" Ron Boyer -George Bush lied about 9x1x1 and about weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. He lied to the American people and this country let him get away with it. Why, we don't know, be he was a corrupt president. Bruce Regael-When questions are asked and then immediately dodged, laughed at, discredited, and resolved with felacious answers, the only answer left is to call people a Conspiracy Theorist to make them look crazy." Thermite traces super hot detected in towers remains. It was an inside job. How corrupt. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44501310/ns/us_news-security/?GT1=43001 See Paul Thompson's terror timeline